An opposing view of cogntivism is the philosophy of
behaviorism. Behaviorism doesn’t take into account what someone thinks about a
situation. The idea is that people learn by being conditioned. This is the same
idea that is seen with Pavlov and his dogs. This is a common philosophy in
schools. If a child finishes their work on time and is given extra time at
recess, then the student will learn to finish his work on time all of the time because
he believes he will receive a reward for this action.
I tend to agree more with cognitivism because it takes into
account what people are thinking and how that effects their beliefs and
actions. Opposing philosophies such as behaviorism do not consider what someone
is thinking about. The problem that I have with this is why do some people
continue to do the same thing even though they are continuously punished. Why
do some people speed when they are driving even though they have been given
multiple speeding tickets? I believe it is because they do not think that speeding is wrong. Even
though you cannot observe people thinking that doesn’t mean that nothing is
going on in their head.
A teacher that believes in the cognitive philosophy will
work to guide students in their learning instead of worrying about what the
student learns at the end. What each student learns will be different because
everyone has different experiences and beliefs and those developed beliefs
influence how they will think about something. Teachers should focus on how a
student gets to an answer instead of what the answer is. This learning approach
teaches student to think critically, which is a skill they will use throughout their
lives to solve problems and learn new things. If students are taught specific
information or a taught to do certain tasks they will eventually forget those
things if they are not used in their daily lives.
No comments:
Post a Comment